Michael Moore’s documentary, “Capitalism: A Love Story,” tries to spotlight the injustices of a free-market economy, but really it just reinforces the idea that life isn’t always fair, and hard work doesn’t always pay off. It’s ironic seeing one of the richest documentary filmmakers criticizing capitalism. He points out that a significant number of young Americans lean towards socialism, but it’s doubtful whether their views will hold as they age and accumulate wealth.
In the film, Moore argues against the harsh realities of capitalism, like buying foreclosed homes from those who fall behind on payments. He suggests that without property vultures, market collapses could worsen, causing more suffering. Moore portrays himself as a lone fighter against systemic injustices, calling for collective action, yet it feels a bit hollow considering his substantial wealth.
There are moments in the film that are truly moving, like the factory workers’ lockout that led to Bank of America releasing owed benefits. It’s a moment that makes you proud to see people stand up for themselves. However, the documentary’s timing seems off, as it came right when the economy began to rebound after the 2008 crash, making some of Moore’s points seem dated or overly pessimistic.
Moore praises President Obama’s initial promises, yet acknowledges the disappointments and compromises that followed, like the special deal made with a Nebraska senator over the healthcare bill. The film also criticizes Wall Street’s bailout, ignoring the fact that most of the funds have been repaid, with the government even claiming a profit.
In conclusion, while Moore’s documentary is engaging and raises valid points for reflection, it fails to convince that capitalism is inherently evil. If capitalism were so evil, why would entities like the Church, one of the richest organizations, or philanthropists like Bill Gates, who has donated billions to combat disease and poverty, participate in it? Moore himself profits nicely from his critiques, which does raise questions about the sincerity and effectiveness of his arguments.
