Here’s a bold idea to improve America’s fiscal health and personal finances: link consumer purchasing limits to high school grades. This might sound unusual, but hear me out.

High school is a universal experience, making it a perfect standard to gauge future fiscal responsibility. Imagine a system where your ability to purchase big-ticket items, like cars, is tied to your academic performance. Cars, often a significant financial burden, could be restricted based on the grades you earned in school.

Here’s the plan:

1. C-average students (around 2.5 GPA): If you only managed a C in high school, you’d be restricted from purchasing a car. This might seem harsh, but the goal is to encourage better financial and academic discipline. If you struggle with basic responsibilities, perhaps it’s best to stick to public transport or cycling, which are both cost-effective and environmentally friendly.

2. B-average students (around 3.0 GPA): Those who scored a B average could purchase reliable but affordable vehicles like the Toyota Corolla or Honda Civic. These cars should not exceed 10% of your annual income, aligning with sensible spending habits.

3. A-average students (3.75 GPA and above): High achievers could choose any car they like but must still adhere to spending no more than 20% of their annual income on their vehicle. This flexibility acknowledges their hard work and presumed financial acumen.

This system aims to teach the value of money and responsibility from a young age. But it doesn’t stop with cars. This model could extend to other areas of spending like clothes and luxury goods, with a comprehensive guide helping regulate purchases to ensure fiscal responsibility.

Additionally, why not consider a work ethic-based taxation system? Here’s how it could work:

40% tax rate for those working 40 hours a week or less: Encourages full employment and maximum productivity.

30% tax rate for those working 50 hours a week: Rewards those putting in extra hours.

15% tax rate for those working 60 hours a week or more: The highest workers would enjoy the lowest tax rates, incentivizing hard work and greater economic contribution.

While these ideas might seem radical, they could potentially drive a more prosperous and responsible society. After all, tough times call for tough measures, and by linking financial privileges with personal effort, we can foster a culture of success and accountability.